httprb/http vs jordansissel/fpm
httprb/http shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, http shows healthier maintenance signals than fpm. http rates Healthy overall while fpm rates Mixed. http last saw a commit 2 months ago with 3+ active contributors, while fpm last saw a commit 2 months ago with 8+ active contributors. http is MIT-licensed while fpm is Other-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
httprb/http →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Small team — 3 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 96% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit 3w ago
- ✓3 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
jordansissel/fpm →
Mixed signals — read the receipts
non-standard license (Other)
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 78% of recent commits
- ⚠Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
- ✓Last commit 2w ago
- ✓8 active contributors
- ✓Other licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| http | fpm | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 3,074 | 11,468 |
| Last commit | 2mo ago | 2mo ago |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Open issues | 25 | 789 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? httprb/http · jordansissel/fpm
Ask AI about httprb/http vs jordansissel/fpm
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.