RepoPilot

huggingface/transformers vs lllyasviel/stable-diffusion-webui-forge

huggingface/transformers shows stronger signals overall

As of June 2026, transformers shows healthier maintenance signals than stable-diffusion-webui-forge. transformers rates Healthy overall while stable-diffusion-webui-forge rates Mixed. transformers was committed to today with 53+ active contributors, while stable-diffusion-webui-forge last saw a commit 11 months ago with 26+ active contributors. transformers is Apache-2.0-licensed while stable-diffusion-webui-forge is AGPL-3.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.

Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.

huggingface/transformers

Healthy

Healthy across the board

HealthyDependency

Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.

HealthyFork & modify

Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

HealthyDeploy as-is

No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.

  • Last commit today
  • 53+ active contributors
  • Distributed ownership (top contributor 7% of recent commits)
  • Apache-2.0 licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard

lllyasviel/stable-diffusion-webui-forge

Mixed

Slowing — last commit 10mo ago

ConcernsDependency

copyleft license (AGPL-3.0) — review compatibility; no CI workflows detected

HealthyFork & modify

Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

MixedDeploy as-is

last commit was 10mo ago; Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10…

  • Slowing — last commit 10mo ago
  • AGPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
  • No CI workflows detected
  • Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
  • Last commit 10mo ago
  • 26+ active contributors
  • Distributed ownership (top contributor 44% of recent commits)
  • AGPL-3.0 licensed
  • Tests present

What would improve this?

  • Use as dependency ConcernsMixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
  • Deploy as-is MixedHealthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days; bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard

Signal-by-signal breakdown

transformersstable-diffusion-webui-forge
Stars161,97112,545
Last committoday11mo ago
LicenseApache-2.0AGPL-3.0
Open issues2,4601,143
Has tests
Has CI
Test coverage5%16%
Dependency CVEsNo CVEsNo CVEs
Architecture grade
Cycles
Bottom-lineHealthy signalsMixed signals

Want the full analysis? huggingface/transformers · lllyasviel/stable-diffusion-webui-forge

Ask AI about huggingface/transformers vs lllyasviel/stable-diffusion-webui-forge

Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.