huggingface/transformers vs microsoft/swin-transformer
huggingface/transformers shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, transformers shows healthier maintenance signals than swin-transformer. transformers rates Healthy overall while swin-transformer rates Mixed. transformers was committed to today with 53+ active contributors, while swin-transformer last saw a commit 1 year ago with 14+ active contributors. transformers is Apache-2.0-licensed while swin-transformer is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
huggingface/transformers →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓53+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 7% of recent commits)
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
microsoft/swin-transformer →
Stale — last commit 2y ago
last commit was 2y ago; no tests detected…
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 2y ago; Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10…
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ⚠Scorecard: marked unmaintained (0/10)
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓14 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 40% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 365 days; add a test suite
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days; bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| transformers | swin-transformer | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 161,971 | 15,902 |
| Last commit | today | 1y ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Open issues | 2,460 | 204 |
| Has tests | ✓ | — |
| Has CI | ✓ | — |
| Test coverage | 5% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? huggingface/transformers · microsoft/swin-transformer
Ask AI about huggingface/transformers vs microsoft/swin-transformer
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.