huggingface/transformers vs thuml/time-series-library
huggingface/transformers shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, transformers shows healthier maintenance signals than time-series-library. transformers rates Healthy overall while time-series-library rates Mixed. transformers was committed to today with 53+ active contributors, while time-series-library last saw a commit 2 months ago with 18+ active contributors. transformers is Apache-2.0-licensed while time-series-library is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
huggingface/transformers →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓53+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 7% of recent commits)
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
thuml/time-series-library →
Mixed signals — read the receipts
no tests detected; no CI workflows detected
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; no CI workflows detected
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 3w ago
- ✓18 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 49% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: add a test suite
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| transformers | time-series-library | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 161,971 | 12,213 |
| Last commit | today | 2mo ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Open issues | 2,460 | 43 |
| Has tests | ✓ | — |
| Has CI | ✓ | — |
| Test coverage | 5% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? huggingface/transformers · thuml/time-series-library
Ask AI about huggingface/transformers vs thuml/time-series-library
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.