huihut/interview vs moonlight-stream/moonlight-qt
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of June 2026, interview and moonlight-qt both show mixed maintenance signals. interview last saw a commit 10 months ago with 20+ active contributors, while moonlight-qt last saw a commit 1 month ago with 8+ active contributors. interview is Other-licensed while moonlight-qt is GPL-3.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
huihut/interview →
Slowing — last commit 9mo ago
non-standard license (Other); no tests detected…
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 9mo ago; no CI workflows detected
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 9mo ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 75% of recent commits
- ⚠Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓Last commit 9mo ago
- ✓20 active contributors
- ✓Other licensed
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
moonlight-stream/moonlight-qt →
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
copyleft license (GPL-3.0) — review compatibility; top contributor handles 93% of recent commits…
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 93% of recent commits
- ⚠GPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓Last commit 1d ago
- ✓8 active contributors
- ✓GPL-3.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| interview | moonlight-qt | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 37,789 | 17,050 |
| Last commit | 10mo ago | 1mo ago |
| License | Other | GPL-3.0 |
| Open issues | 2 | 524 |
| Has tests | — | — |
| Has CI | — | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 0% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? huihut/interview · moonlight-stream/moonlight-qt
Ask AI about huihut/interview vs moonlight-stream/moonlight-qt
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.