huiyadanli/revokemsgpatcher vs raywangqvq/bilibilitoolpro
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of September 2026, revokemsgpatcher and bilibilitoolpro both show mixed maintenance signals. revokemsgpatcher last saw a commit 1 month ago with 7+ active contributors, while bilibilitoolpro last saw a commit 4 months ago with 2+ active contributors. Both use the GPL-3.0 license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
huiyadanli/revokemsgpatcher
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
copyleft license (GPL-3.0) — review compatibility; top contributor handles 92% of recent commits…
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 92% of recent commits
- ⚠GPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ⚠No tests detected in the complete Git tree
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 1w ago
- ✓7 active contributors
- ✓GPL-3.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
What would improve this?
- •Use as dependency Concerns to Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
raywangqvq/bilibilitoolpro
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
copyleft license (GPL-3.0) — review compatibility; top contributor handles 99% of recent commits…
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Small team — 2 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 99% of recent commits
- ⚠GPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ✓Last commit 2d ago
- ✓2 active contributors
- ✓GPL-3.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Use as dependency Concerns to Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| revokemsgpatcher | bilibilitoolpro | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 38,564 | 8,576 |
| Last commit | 1mo ago | 4mo ago |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Open issues | 58 | 138 |
| Has tests | No | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 0% | 1% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | C | — |
| Cycles | 0 | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? huiyadanli/revokemsgpatcher · raywangqvq/bilibilitoolpro
Ask AI about huiyadanli/revokemsgpatcher vs raywangqvq/bilibilitoolpro
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.