hyperoslo/imagepicker vs johncoates/aerial
johncoates/aerial shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, aerial shows healthier maintenance signals than imagepicker. aerial rates Healthy overall while imagepicker rates Mixed. imagepicker last saw a commit 1 year ago with 28+ active contributors, while aerial last saw a commit 10 months ago with 9+ active contributors. imagepicker is Other-licensed while aerial is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
hyperoslo/imagepicker →
Stale — last commit 2y ago
non-standard license (Other); last commit was 2y ago…
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 2y ago; no CI workflows detected
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ⚠Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓28+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 22% of recent commits)
- ✓Other licensed
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
johncoates/aerial →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 9mo ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 75% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit 9mo ago
- ✓9 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| imagepicker | aerial | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 4,896 | 20,972 |
| Last commit | 1y ago | 10mo ago |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Open issues | 24 | 28 |
| Has tests | — | ✓ |
| Has CI | — | ✓ |
| Test coverage | — | — |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? hyperoslo/imagepicker · johncoates/aerial
Ask AI about hyperoslo/imagepicker vs johncoates/aerial
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.