hyprwm/hyprland vs microsoft/wslg
hyprwm/hyprland shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, hyprland shows healthier maintenance signals than wslg. hyprland rates Healthy overall while wslg rates Mixed. hyprland last saw a commit 1 month ago with 30+ active contributors, while wslg last saw a commit 2 months ago with 18+ active contributors. hyprland is BSD-3-Clause-licensed while wslg is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
hyprwm/hyprland →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 50% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓30+ active contributors
- ✓BSD-3-Clause licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
microsoft/wslg →
Mixed signals — read the receipts
no tests detected; no CI workflows detected
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓Last commit 4w ago
- ✓18 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 24% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: add a test suite
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| hyprland | wslg | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 35,578 | 11,641 |
| Last commit | 1mo ago | 2mo ago |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Open issues | 185 | 677 |
| Has tests | ✓ | — |
| Has CI | ✓ | — |
| Test coverage | 23% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? hyprwm/hyprland · microsoft/wslg
Ask AI about hyprwm/hyprland vs microsoft/wslg
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.