hyprwm/hyprland vs moonlight-stream/moonlight-qt
hyprwm/hyprland shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, hyprland shows healthier maintenance signals than moonlight-qt. hyprland rates Healthy overall while moonlight-qt rates Mixed. hyprland last saw a commit 1 month ago with 30+ active contributors, while moonlight-qt last saw a commit 1 month ago with 8+ active contributors. hyprland is BSD-3-Clause-licensed while moonlight-qt is GPL-3.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
hyprwm/hyprland →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 50% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓30+ active contributors
- ✓BSD-3-Clause licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
moonlight-stream/moonlight-qt →
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
copyleft license (GPL-3.0) — review compatibility; top contributor handles 93% of recent commits…
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 93% of recent commits
- ⚠GPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓Last commit 1d ago
- ✓8 active contributors
- ✓GPL-3.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| hyprland | moonlight-qt | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 35,578 | 17,050 |
| Last commit | 1mo ago | 1mo ago |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | GPL-3.0 |
| Open issues | 185 | 524 |
| Has tests | ✓ | — |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 23% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? hyprwm/hyprland · moonlight-stream/moonlight-qt
Ask AI about hyprwm/hyprland vs moonlight-stream/moonlight-qt
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.