hyprwm/hyprland vs tarscloud/tars
hyprwm/hyprland shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, hyprland shows healthier maintenance signals than tars. hyprland rates Healthy overall while tars rates Mixed. hyprland last saw a commit 1 month ago with 30+ active contributors, while tars last saw a commit 2 years ago with 3+ active contributors. Both use the BSD-3-Clause license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
hyprwm/hyprland →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 50% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓30+ active contributors
- ✓BSD-3-Clause licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
tarscloud/tars →
Stale — last commit 2y ago
last commit was 2y ago; top contributor handles 96% of recent commits
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ⚠Small team — 3 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 96% of recent commits
- ✓3 active contributors
- ✓BSD-3-Clause licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 365 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| hyprland | tars | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 35,578 | 10,083 |
| Last commit | 1mo ago | 2y ago |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | BSD-3-Clause |
| Open issues | 185 | 48 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 23% | 33% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? hyprwm/hyprland · tarscloud/tars
Ask AI about hyprwm/hyprland vs tarscloud/tars
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.