hyprwm/hyprland vs tstack/lnav
Both showing Healthy signals — pick on fit, not health
As of June 2026, hyprland and lnav both show healthy maintenance signals. hyprland last saw a commit 1 month ago with 30+ active contributors, while lnav last saw a commit 1 month ago with 2+ active contributors. hyprland is BSD-3-Clause-licensed while lnav is BSD-2-Clause-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
hyprwm/hyprland →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 50% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓30+ active contributors
- ✓BSD-3-Clause licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
tstack/lnav →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Small team — 2 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 99% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓2 active contributors
- ✓BSD-2-Clause licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| hyprland | lnav | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 35,578 | 10,251 |
| Last commit | 1mo ago | 1mo ago |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | BSD-2-Clause |
| Open issues | 185 | 269 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 23% | 23% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? hyprwm/hyprland · tstack/lnav
Ask AI about hyprwm/hyprland vs tstack/lnav
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.