iced-rs/iced vs ultraworkers/claw-code
Both showing Healthy signals — pick on fit, not health
As of September 2026, iced and claw-code both show healthy maintenance signals. iced was committed to 2 weeks ago with 9+ active contributors, while claw-code last saw a commit 1 month ago with 11+ active contributors. Both use the MIT license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
iced-rs/iced
Healthy across all four use cases
No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No blocking repository-level signals were found; deployment review is still required.
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 85% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit 1d ago
- ✓9 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
ultraworkers/claw-code
Healthy across all four use cases
No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No blocking repository-level signals were found; deployment review is still required.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 65% of recent commits
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 3w ago
- ✓11 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| iced | claw-code | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 31,411 | 195,190 |
| Last commit | 15d ago | 1mo ago |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Open issues | 490 | 41 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 3% | 13% |
| Dependency CVEs | 0 critical · 0 high · 4 moderate · 0 low | 0 critical · 0 high · 1 moderate · 0 low |
| Architecture grade | — | A |
| Cycles | — | 0 |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? iced-rs/iced · ultraworkers/claw-code
Ask AI about iced-rs/iced vs ultraworkers/claw-code
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.