inconshreveable/ngrok vs sourcegraph/conc
sourcegraph/conc shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, conc shows healthier maintenance signals than ngrok. conc rates Healthy overall while ngrok rates Mixed. ngrok last saw a commit 2 years ago with 21+ active contributors, while conc last saw a commit 1 month ago with 14+ active contributors. ngrok is Other-licensed while conc is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
inconshreveable/ngrok →
Stale — last commit 2y ago
non-standard license (Other); last commit was 2y ago…
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 67% of recent commits
- ⚠Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓21+ active contributors
- ✓Other licensed
- ✓CI configured
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
sourcegraph/conc →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓Last commit 1w ago
- ✓14 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 39% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| ngrok | conc | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 24,466 | 10,381 |
| Last commit | 2y ago | 1mo ago |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Open issues | 0 | 29 |
| Has tests | — | — |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 0% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? inconshreveable/ngrok · sourcegraph/conc
Ask AI about inconshreveable/ngrok vs sourcegraph/conc
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.