RepoPilot

infiniflow/ragflow vs johnkerl/miller

infiniflow/ragflow shows stronger signals overall

As of June 2026, ragflow shows healthier maintenance signals than miller. ragflow rates Healthy overall while miller rates Mixed. ragflow was committed to 1 day ago with 32+ active contributors, while miller last saw a commit 1 month ago with 7+ active contributors. ragflow is Apache-2.0-licensed while miller is Other-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.

Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.

infiniflow/ragflow

Healthy

Healthy across the board

HealthyDependency

Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.

HealthyFork & modify

Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

MixedDeploy as-is

Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; 8 cyclic import chains — pervasive coupling

  • Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
  • Last commit today
  • 32+ active contributors
  • Distributed ownership (top contributor 16% of recent commits)
  • Apache-2.0 licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

What would improve this?

  • Deploy as-is MixedHealthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard

johnkerl/miller

Mixed

Mixed signals — read the receipts

ConcernsDependency

non-standard license (Other)

HealthyFork & modify

Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

HealthyDeploy as-is

No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.

  • Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 58% of recent commits
  • Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
  • Last commit 3d ago
  • 7 active contributors
  • Other licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

What would improve this?

  • Use as dependency ConcernsMixed if: clarify license terms

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests

Signal-by-signal breakdown

ragflowmiller
Stars83,6939,860
Last commit1d ago1mo ago
LicenseApache-2.0Other
Open issues2,822111
Has tests
Has CI
Test coverage7%4%
Dependency CVEsNo CVEsNo CVEs
Architecture gradeC
Cycles8
Bottom-lineHealthy signalsMixed signals

Want the full analysis? infiniflow/ragflow · johnkerl/miller

Ask AI about infiniflow/ragflow vs johnkerl/miller

Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.