infiniflow/ragflow vs microsoft/autogen
Both showing Healthy signals — pick on fit, not health
As of June 2026, ragflow and autogen both show healthy maintenance signals. ragflow last saw a commit 1 month ago with 39+ active contributors, while autogen last saw a commit 2 months ago with 33+ active contributors. ragflow is Apache-2.0-licensed while autogen is CC-BY-4.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
infiniflow/ragflow →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓39+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 11% of recent commits)
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Maintenance signals: commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
microsoft/autogen →
Healthy across the board
non-standard license (CC-BY-4.0)
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Non-standard license (CC-BY-4.0) — review terms
- ✓Last commit 3w ago
- ✓33+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 41% of recent commits)
- ✓CC-BY-4.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
Maintenance signals: commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| ragflow | autogen | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 80,024 | 57,844 |
| Last commit | 1mo ago | 2mo ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | CC-BY-4.0 |
| Open issues | 3,045 | 811 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 7% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? infiniflow/ragflow · microsoft/autogen
Ask AI about infiniflow/ragflow vs microsoft/autogen
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.