influxdata/influxdb vs rustdesk/rustdesk
Both showing Healthy signals — pick on fit, not health
As of September 2026, influxdb and rustdesk both show healthy maintenance signals. influxdb was committed to 3 weeks ago with 19+ active contributors, while rustdesk was committed to 3 days ago with 32+ active contributors. influxdb is Apache-2.0-licensed while rustdesk is AGPL-3.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
influxdata/influxdb
Healthy across all four use cases
No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No blocking repository-level signals were found; deployment review is still required.
- ✓Last commit 3d ago
- ✓19 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 23% of recent commits)
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
rustdesk/rustdesk
Strong maintenance signals
copyleft license (AGPL-3.0) — review compatibility
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; 4 cyclic import chains — pervasive coupling
- ⚠AGPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓32+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 36% of recent commits)
- ✓AGPL-3.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Use as dependency Concerns to Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| influxdb | rustdesk | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 31,709 | 123,381 |
| Last commit | 27d ago | 3d ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Open issues | 2,148 | 164 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 12% | 6% |
| Dependency CVEs | 0 critical · 0 high · 1 moderate · 0 low | 0 critical · 0 high · 2 moderate · 0 low |
| Architecture grade | — | B |
| Cycles | — | 4 |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? influxdata/influxdb · rustdesk/rustdesk
Ask AI about influxdata/influxdb vs rustdesk/rustdesk
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.