RepoPilot

interpretml/interpret vs microsoft/wsl

Both showing Healthy signals — pick on fit, not health

As of June 2026, interpret and wsl both show healthy maintenance signals. interpret last saw a commit 1 month ago with 6+ active contributors, while wsl last saw a commit 1 month ago with 22+ active contributors. Both use the MIT license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.

Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.

interpretml/interpret

Healthy

Healthy across all four use cases

HealthyDependency

Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.

HealthyFork & modify

Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

HealthyDeploy as-is

No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.

  • Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 93% of recent commits
  • Last commit 2d ago
  • 6 active contributors
  • MIT licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests

microsoft/wsl

Healthy

Healthy across the board

HealthyDependency

Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.

HealthyFork & modify

Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

HealthyDeploy as-is

No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.

  • Last commit today
  • 22+ active contributors
  • Distributed ownership (top contributor 42% of recent commits)
  • MIT licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests

Signal-by-signal breakdown

interpretwsl
Stars6,84732,194
Last commit1mo ago1mo ago
LicenseMITMIT
Open issues111953
Has tests
Has CI
Test coverage47%4%
Dependency CVEsNo CVEsNo CVEs
Architecture grade
Cycles
Bottom-lineHealthy signalsHealthy signals

Want the full analysis? interpretml/interpret · microsoft/wsl

Ask AI about interpretml/interpret vs microsoft/wsl

Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.