interpretml/interpret vs ssloy/tinyrenderer
interpretml/interpret shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, interpret shows healthier maintenance signals than tinyrenderer. interpret rates Healthy overall while tinyrenderer rates Mixed. interpret last saw a commit 1 month ago with 6+ active contributors, while tinyrenderer last saw a commit 7 months ago with 8+ active contributors. interpret is MIT-licensed while tinyrenderer is Other-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
interpretml/interpret →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 93% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit 2d ago
- ✓6 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
ssloy/tinyrenderer →
Slowing — last commit 6mo ago
non-standard license (Other); top contributor handles 90% of recent commits…
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 6mo ago
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 90% of recent commits
- ⚠Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓Last commit 6mo ago
- ✓8 active contributors
- ✓Other licensed
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| interpret | tinyrenderer | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 6,847 | 23,510 |
| Last commit | 1mo ago | 7mo ago |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Open issues | 111 | 4 |
| Has tests | ✓ | — |
| Has CI | ✓ | — |
| Test coverage | 47% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? interpretml/interpret · ssloy/tinyrenderer
Ask AI about interpretml/interpret vs ssloy/tinyrenderer
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.