ipader/swiftguide vs relatedcode/progresshud
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of June 2026, swiftguide and progresshud both show mixed maintenance signals. swiftguide last saw a commit 1 month ago with 7+ active contributors, while progresshud last saw a commit 5 months ago with 7+ active contributors. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
ipader/swiftguide →
Missing license — unclear to depend on
no license — legally unclear; no tests detected…
no license — can't legally use code; no tests detected…
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
no license — can't legally use code; Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10…
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 81% of recent commits
- ⚠No license — legally unclear to depend on
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 4w ago
- ✓7 active contributors
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: publish a permissive license (MIT, Apache-2.0, etc.)
- →Fork & modify Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
- →Deploy as-is Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
relatedcode/progresshud →
Slowing — last commit 3mo ago
top contributor handles 91% of recent commits; no tests detected…
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 3mo ago
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 91% of recent commits
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓Last commit 3mo ago
- ✓7 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: diversify commit ownership (top <90%); add a test suite
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| swiftguide | progresshud | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 15,986 | 2,966 |
| Last commit | 1mo ago | 5mo ago |
| License | — | MIT |
| Open issues | 0 | 12 |
| Has tests | — | — |
| Has CI | — | — |
| Test coverage | — | — |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | C | — |
| Cycles | 0 | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? ipader/swiftguide · relatedcode/progresshud
Ask AI about ipader/swiftguide vs relatedcode/progresshud
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.