ityouknow/spring-boot-examples vs nayuki/qr-code-generator
Both showing Concerns signals — pick on fit, not health
As of June 2026, spring-boot-examples and qr-code-generator both show concerning maintenance signals. spring-boot-examples last saw a commit 2 years ago with 7+ active contributors, while qr-code-generator last saw a commit 1 year ago with 2+ active contributors. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
ityouknow/spring-boot-examples →
Stale and unlicensed — last commit 2y ago
no license — legally unclear; last commit was 2y ago…
no license — can't legally use code; no CI workflows detected…
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
no license — can't legally use code; last commit was 2y ago…
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 94% of recent commits
- ⚠No license — legally unclear to depend on
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ✓7 active contributors
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: publish a permissive license (MIT, Apache-2.0, etc.)
- →Fork & modify Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
- →Deploy as-is Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
nayuki/qr-code-generator →
Stale and unlicensed — last commit 1y ago
no license — legally unclear; last commit was 1y ago…
no license — can't legally use code; no tests detected…
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
no license — can't legally use code; last commit was 1y ago…
- ⚠Stale — last commit 1y ago
- ⚠Small team — 2 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 99% of recent commits
- ⚠No license — legally unclear to depend on
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓2 active contributors
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: publish a permissive license (MIT, Apache-2.0, etc.); 1 commit in the last 365 days
- →Fork & modify Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
- →Deploy as-is Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| spring-boot-examples | qr-code-generator | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 30,602 | 6,567 |
| Last commit | 2y ago | 1y ago |
| License | — | — |
| Open issues | 18 | 12 |
| Has tests | ✓ | — |
| Has CI | — | — |
| Test coverage | 100% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Concerns signals | Concerns signals |
Want the full analysis? ityouknow/spring-boot-examples · nayuki/qr-code-generator
Ask AI about ityouknow/spring-boot-examples vs nayuki/qr-code-generator
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.