ivanceras/svgbob vs ruvnet/ruview
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of September 2026, svgbob and ruview both show mixed maintenance signals. svgbob last saw a commit 4 months ago with 4+ active contributors, while ruview was committed to 1 week ago with 2+ active contributors. svgbob is Apache-2.0-licensed while ruview is MIT-licensed. ruview has no known critical CVEs, while svgbob has 1.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
ivanceras/svgbob
Slowing — last commit 5mo ago
1 high-severity CVE in dependencies; top contributor handles 96% of recent commits
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
1 high-severity CVE in dependencies; Scorecard "Token-Permissions" is 0/10
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 5mo ago
- ⚠Small team — 4 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 96% of recent commits
- ⚠Scorecard: marked unmaintained (0/10)
- ⚠1 high-severity advisory in transitive deps
- ✓Last commit 5mo ago
- ✓4 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Use as dependency Mixed to Healthy if: resolve the high-severity advisory
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: resolve the high-severity advisory
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
ruvnet/ruview
Mixed signals — read the receipts
No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; 1 cyclic import chain detected
- ⚠Small team — 2 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 71% of recent commits
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓2 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| svgbob | ruview | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 4,223 | 92,443 |
| Last commit | 4mo ago | 13d ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Open issues | 39 | 613 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 10% | 24% |
| Dependency CVEs | 0 critical · 1 high · 3 moderate · 0 low | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | A | A |
| Cycles | 0 | 1 |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? ivanceras/svgbob · ruvnet/ruview
Ask AI about ivanceras/svgbob vs ruvnet/ruview
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.