ivanceras/svgbob vs tw93/pake
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of September 2026, svgbob and pake both show mixed maintenance signals. svgbob last saw a commit 4 months ago with 4+ active contributors, while pake was committed to 1 week ago with 15+ active contributors. svgbob is Apache-2.0-licensed while pake is GPL-3.0-licensed. pake has no known critical CVEs, while svgbob has 1.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
ivanceras/svgbob
Slowing — last commit 5mo ago
1 high-severity CVE in dependencies; top contributor handles 96% of recent commits
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
1 high-severity CVE in dependencies; Scorecard "Token-Permissions" is 0/10
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 5mo ago
- ⚠Small team — 4 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 96% of recent commits
- ⚠Scorecard: marked unmaintained (0/10)
- ⚠1 high-severity advisory in transitive deps
- ✓Last commit 5mo ago
- ✓4 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Use as dependency Mixed to Healthy if: resolve the high-severity advisory
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: resolve the high-severity advisory
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
tw93/pake
Mixed signals — read the receipts
copyleft license (GPL-3.0) — review compatibility
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No blocking repository-level signals were found; deployment review is still required.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 56% of recent commits
- ⚠GPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓15 active contributors
- ✓GPL-3.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Use as dependency Concerns to Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| svgbob | pake | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 4,223 | 61,322 |
| Last commit | 4mo ago | 10d ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Open issues | 39 | 0 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 10% | 89% |
| Dependency CVEs | 0 critical · 1 high · 3 moderate · 0 low | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | A | A |
| Cycles | 0 | 0 |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? ivanceras/svgbob · tw93/pake
Ask AI about ivanceras/svgbob vs tw93/pake
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.