RepoPilot

jack-cherish/python-spider vs vinta/awesome-python

vinta/awesome-python shows stronger signals overall

As of June 2026, awesome-python shows stronger maintenance signals than python-spider. awesome-python rates Mixed overall while python-spider rates Concerns. python-spider last saw a commit 1 year ago with 3+ active contributors, while awesome-python was committed to 3 days ago with 26+ active contributors. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.

Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.

jack-cherish/python-spider

Concerns

Stale and unlicensed — last commit 2y ago

ConcernsDependency

no license — legally unclear; last commit was 2y ago…

ConcernsFork & modify

no license — can't legally use code; no CI workflows detected

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

ConcernsDeploy as-is

no license — can't legally use code; last commit was 2y ago…

  • Stale — last commit 2y ago
  • Small team — 3 contributors active in recent commits
  • Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 81% of recent commits
  • No license — legally unclear to depend on
  • No CI workflows detected
  • 3 active contributors
  • Tests present

What would improve this?

  • Use as dependency ConcernsMixed if: publish a permissive license (MIT, Apache-2.0, etc.)
  • Fork & modify ConcernsMixed if: add a LICENSE file
  • Deploy as-is ConcernsMixed if: add a LICENSE file

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests

vinta/awesome-python

Mixed

Mixed signals — read the receipts

ConcernsDependency

non-standard license (Other)

HealthyFork & modify

Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

HealthyDeploy as-is

No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.

  • Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 60% of recent commits
  • Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
  • Last commit 1d ago
  • 26+ active contributors
  • Other licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

What would improve this?

  • Use as dependency ConcernsMixed if: clarify license terms

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard

Signal-by-signal breakdown

python-spiderawesome-python
Stars19,607304,706
Last commit1y ago3d ago
LicenseOther
Open issues2119
Has tests
Has CI
Test coverage2%100%
Dependency CVEsNo CVEsNo CVEs
Architecture grade
Cycles
Bottom-lineConcerns signalsMixed signals

Want the full analysis? jack-cherish/python-spider · vinta/awesome-python

Ask AI about jack-cherish/python-spider vs vinta/awesome-python

Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.