jakewharton/butterknife vs java-decompiler/jd-gui
jakewharton/butterknife shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, butterknife shows healthier maintenance signals than jd-gui. butterknife rates Healthy overall while jd-gui rates Mixed. butterknife last saw a commit 2 years ago with 17+ active contributors, while jd-gui last saw a commit 1 year ago with 4+ active contributors. butterknife is Apache-2.0-licensed while jd-gui is GPL-3.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
jakewharton/butterknife →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Stale — last commit 3y ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 75% of recent commits
- ✓17 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
java-decompiler/jd-gui →
Stale — last commit 2y ago
copyleft license (GPL-3.0) — review compatibility; last commit was 2y ago…
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 2y ago; no CI workflows detected
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ⚠Small team — 4 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 95% of recent commits
- ⚠GPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ✓4 active contributors
- ✓GPL-3.0 licensed
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| butterknife | jd-gui | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 25,377 | 15,083 |
| Last commit | 2y ago | 1y ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Open issues | 119 | 247 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | — |
| Test coverage | 57% | 5% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? jakewharton/butterknife · java-decompiler/jd-gui
Ask AI about jakewharton/butterknife vs java-decompiler/jd-gui
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.