RepoPilot

jakewharton/butterknife vs java-native-access/jna

jakewharton/butterknife shows stronger signals overall

As of June 2026, butterknife shows healthier maintenance signals than jna. butterknife rates Healthy overall while jna rates Mixed. butterknife last saw a commit 2 years ago with 17+ active contributors, while jna last saw a commit 2 months ago with 20+ active contributors. butterknife is Apache-2.0-licensed while jna is Other-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.

Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.

jakewharton/butterknife

Healthy

Healthy across all four use cases

HealthyDependency

Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.

HealthyFork & modify

Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

HealthyDeploy as-is

No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.

  • Stale — last commit 3y ago
  • Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 75% of recent commits
  • 17 active contributors
  • Apache-2.0 licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests

java-native-access/jna

Mixed

Mixed signals — read the receipts

ConcernsDependency

non-standard license (Other)

HealthyFork & modify

Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

HealthyDeploy as-is

No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.

  • Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 67% of recent commits
  • Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
  • Last commit 3w ago
  • 20 active contributors
  • Other licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

What would improve this?

  • Use as dependency ConcernsMixed if: clarify license terms

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests

Signal-by-signal breakdown

butterknifejna
Stars25,3778,910
Last commit2y ago2mo ago
LicenseApache-2.0Other
Open issues119120
Has tests
Has CI
Test coverage57%30%
Dependency CVEsNo CVEsNo CVEs
Architecture grade
Cycles
Bottom-lineHealthy signalsMixed signals

Want the full analysis? jakewharton/butterknife · java-native-access/jna

Ask AI about jakewharton/butterknife vs java-native-access/jna

Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.