jakewharton/butterknife vs ksoichiro/android-observablescrollview
jakewharton/butterknife shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, butterknife shows healthier maintenance signals than android-observablescrollview. butterknife rates Healthy overall while android-observablescrollview rates Mixed. butterknife last saw a commit 2 years ago with 17+ active contributors, while android-observablescrollview last saw a commit 5 years ago with 9+ active contributors. Both use the Apache-2.0 license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
jakewharton/butterknife →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Stale — last commit 3y ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 75% of recent commits
- ✓17 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
ksoichiro/android-observablescrollview →
Stale — last commit 5y ago
last commit was 5y ago; top contributor handles 90% of recent commits
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 5y ago; Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10
- ⚠Stale — last commit 5y ago
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 90% of recent commits
- ⚠Scorecard: marked unmaintained (0/10)
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓9 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 365 days
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| butterknife | android-observablescrollview | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 25,377 | 9,611 |
| Last commit | 2y ago | 5y ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Open issues | 119 | 178 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 57% | 40% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? jakewharton/butterknife · ksoichiro/android-observablescrollview
Ask AI about jakewharton/butterknife vs ksoichiro/android-observablescrollview
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.