jakewharton/butterknife vs qiurunze123/miaosha
jakewharton/butterknife shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, butterknife shows healthier maintenance signals than miaosha. butterknife rates Healthy overall while miaosha rates Concerns. butterknife last saw a commit 2 years ago with 17+ active contributors, while miaosha last saw a commit 1 year ago with 11+ active contributors. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
jakewharton/butterknife →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Stale — last commit 3y ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 75% of recent commits
- ✓17 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
qiurunze123/miaosha →
Stale and unlicensed — last commit 1y ago
no license — legally unclear; last commit was 1y ago…
no license — can't legally use code; no tests detected
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
no license — can't legally use code; last commit was 1y ago
- ⚠Stale — last commit 1y ago
- ⚠No license — legally unclear to depend on
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓11 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 42% of recent commits)
- ✓CI configured
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: publish a permissive license (MIT, Apache-2.0, etc.)
- →Fork & modify Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
- →Deploy as-is Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| butterknife | miaosha | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 25,377 | 26,605 |
| Last commit | 2y ago | 1y ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | — |
| Open issues | 119 | 6 |
| Has tests | ✓ | — |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 57% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Concerns signals |
Want the full analysis? jakewharton/butterknife · qiurunze123/miaosha
Ask AI about jakewharton/butterknife vs qiurunze123/miaosha
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.