jakewharton/butterknife vs tronprotocol/java-tron
Both showing Healthy signals — pick on fit, not health
As of June 2026, butterknife and java-tron both show healthy maintenance signals. butterknife last saw a commit 2 years ago with 17+ active contributors, while java-tron last saw a commit 1 month ago with 19+ active contributors. butterknife is Apache-2.0-licensed while java-tron is LGPL-3.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
jakewharton/butterknife →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Stale — last commit 3y ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 75% of recent commits
- ✓17 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
tronprotocol/java-tron →
Healthy across the board
copyleft license (LGPL-3.0) — review compatibility
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠LGPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓19 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 17% of recent commits)
- ✓LGPL-3.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| butterknife | java-tron | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 25,377 | 4,071 |
| Last commit | 2y ago | 1mo ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | LGPL-3.0 |
| Open issues | 119 | 51 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 57% | 4% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? jakewharton/butterknife · tronprotocol/java-tron
Ask AI about jakewharton/butterknife vs tronprotocol/java-tron
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.