jakewharton/butterknife vs yalantis/ucrop
jakewharton/butterknife shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, butterknife shows healthier maintenance signals than ucrop. butterknife rates Healthy overall while ucrop rates Mixed. butterknife last saw a commit 2 years ago with 17+ active contributors, while ucrop last saw a commit 10 months ago with 31+ active contributors. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
jakewharton/butterknife →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Stale — last commit 3y ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 75% of recent commits
- ✓17 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
yalantis/ucrop →
Slowing — last commit 9mo ago
no license — legally unclear; no tests detected…
no license — can't legally use code; no tests detected…
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
no license — can't legally use code; last commit was 9mo ago…
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 9mo ago
- ⚠No license — legally unclear to depend on
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓Last commit 9mo ago
- ✓31+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 31% of recent commits)
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: publish a permissive license (MIT, Apache-2.0, etc.)
- →Fork & modify Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
- →Deploy as-is Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| butterknife | ucrop | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 25,377 | 12,090 |
| Last commit | 2y ago | 10mo ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | — |
| Open issues | 119 | 330 |
| Has tests | ✓ | — |
| Has CI | ✓ | — |
| Test coverage | 57% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? jakewharton/butterknife · yalantis/ucrop
Ask AI about jakewharton/butterknife vs yalantis/ucrop
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.