jamiebuilds/itsy-bitsy-data-structures vs nuysoft/mock
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of June 2026, itsy-bitsy-data-structures and mock both show mixed maintenance signals. itsy-bitsy-data-structures last saw a commit 5 years ago with 25+ active contributors, while mock last saw a commit 2 years ago with 3+ active contributors. itsy-bitsy-data-structures is CC-BY-4.0-licensed while mock is Other-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
jamiebuilds/itsy-bitsy-data-structures →
Stale — last commit 5y ago
non-standard license (CC-BY-4.0); last commit was 5y ago…
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 5y ago; Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10…
- ⚠Stale — last commit 5y ago
- ⚠Non-standard license (CC-BY-4.0) — review terms
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠Scorecard: marked unmaintained (0/10)
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓25+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 19% of recent commits)
- ✓CC-BY-4.0 licensed
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days; bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
nuysoft/mock →
Stale — last commit 2y ago
non-standard license (Other); last commit was 2y ago
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ⚠Small team — 3 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 68% of recent commits
- ⚠Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
- ✓3 active contributors
- ✓Other licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| itsy-bitsy-data-structures | mock | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 8,578 | 19,627 |
| Last commit | 5y ago | 2y ago |
| License | CC-BY-4.0 | Other |
| Open issues | 14 | 342 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | — | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 100% | 52% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? jamiebuilds/itsy-bitsy-data-structures · nuysoft/mock
Ask AI about jamiebuilds/itsy-bitsy-data-structures vs nuysoft/mock
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.