jamiebuilds/itsy-bitsy-data-structures vs shopify/draggable
shopify/draggable shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, draggable shows healthier maintenance signals than itsy-bitsy-data-structures. draggable rates Healthy overall while itsy-bitsy-data-structures rates Mixed. itsy-bitsy-data-structures last saw a commit 5 years ago with 25+ active contributors, while draggable last saw a commit 6 months ago with 5+ active contributors. itsy-bitsy-data-structures is CC-BY-4.0-licensed while draggable is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
jamiebuilds/itsy-bitsy-data-structures →
Stale — last commit 5y ago
non-standard license (CC-BY-4.0); last commit was 5y ago…
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 5y ago; Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10…
- ⚠Stale — last commit 5y ago
- ⚠Non-standard license (CC-BY-4.0) — review terms
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠Scorecard: marked unmaintained (0/10)
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓25+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 19% of recent commits)
- ✓CC-BY-4.0 licensed
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days; bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
shopify/draggable →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 5mo ago
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 87% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit 5mo ago
- ✓5 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| itsy-bitsy-data-structures | draggable | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 8,578 | 18,453 |
| Last commit | 5y ago | 6mo ago |
| License | CC-BY-4.0 | MIT |
| Open issues | 14 | 165 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | — | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 100% | 43% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? jamiebuilds/itsy-bitsy-data-structures · shopify/draggable
Ask AI about jamiebuilds/itsy-bitsy-data-structures vs shopify/draggable
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.