jankotek/mapdb vs lmax-exchange/disruptor
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of September 2026, mapdb and disruptor both show mixed maintenance signals. mapdb last saw a commit 2 years ago with 3+ active contributors, while disruptor last saw a commit 1 year ago with 14+ active contributors. Both use the Apache-2.0 license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
jankotek/mapdb
Stale — last commit 2y ago
last commit was 2y ago; top contributor handles 98% of recent commits…
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 2y ago; dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ⚠Small team — 3 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 98% of recent commits
- ✓3 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Use as dependency Mixed to Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 365 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
lmax-exchange/disruptor
Stale — last commit 1y ago
last commit was 1y ago; dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 1y ago; dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Stale — last commit 1y ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 61% of recent commits
- ✓14 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| mapdb | disruptor | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 5,047 | 18,326 |
| Last commit | 2y ago | 1y ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Open issues | 200 | 17 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 67% | 41% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? jankotek/mapdb · lmax-exchange/disruptor
Ask AI about jankotek/mapdb vs lmax-exchange/disruptor
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.