jasontaylordev/cleanarchitecture vs microsoft/perfview
Both showing Healthy signals — pick on fit, not health
As of June 2026, cleanarchitecture and perfview both show healthy maintenance signals. cleanarchitecture last saw a commit 1 month ago with 3+ active contributors, while perfview last saw a commit 2 months ago with 15+ active contributors. Both use the MIT license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
jasontaylordev/cleanarchitecture →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Small team — 3 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 56% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit 1d ago
- ✓3 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
microsoft/perfview →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ✓Last commit 2w ago
- ✓15 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 43% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| cleanarchitecture | perfview | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 20,031 | 4,676 |
| Last commit | 1mo ago | 2mo ago |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Open issues | 18 | 97 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 55% | 2% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? jasontaylordev/cleanarchitecture · microsoft/perfview
Ask AI about jasontaylordev/cleanarchitecture vs microsoft/perfview
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.