javscraper/emby.plugins.javscraper vs thangchung/awesome-dotnet-core
thangchung/awesome-dotnet-core shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, awesome-dotnet-core shows stronger maintenance signals than emby.plugins.javscraper. awesome-dotnet-core rates Mixed overall while emby.plugins.javscraper rates Concerns. emby.plugins.javscraper last saw a commit 1 year ago with 6+ active contributors, while awesome-dotnet-core last saw a commit 4 months ago with 34+ active contributors. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
javscraper/emby.plugins.javscraper →
Stale and unlicensed — last commit 2y ago
no license — legally unclear; last commit was 2y ago…
no license — can't legally use code; no tests detected…
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
no license — can't legally use code; last commit was 2y ago…
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 94% of recent commits
- ⚠No license — legally unclear to depend on
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓6 active contributors
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: publish a permissive license (MIT, Apache-2.0, etc.); 1 commit in the last 365 days
- →Fork & modify Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
- →Deploy as-is Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
thangchung/awesome-dotnet-core →
Missing license — unclear to depend on
no license — legally unclear; no tests detected
no license — can't legally use code; no tests detected
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
no license — can't legally use code
- ⚠No license — legally unclear to depend on
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓Last commit 2mo ago
- ✓34+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 42% of recent commits)
- ✓CI configured
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: publish a permissive license (MIT, Apache-2.0, etc.)
- →Fork & modify Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
- →Deploy as-is Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| emby.plugins.javscraper | awesome-dotnet-core | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 3,766 | 21,225 |
| Last commit | 1y ago | 4mo ago |
| License | — | — |
| Open issues | 276 | 193 |
| Has tests | — | — |
| Has CI | — | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 0% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Concerns signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? javscraper/emby.plugins.javscraper · thangchung/awesome-dotnet-core
Ask AI about javscraper/emby.plugins.javscraper vs thangchung/awesome-dotnet-core
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.