jgthms/bulma vs twbs/bootstrap
twbs/bootstrap shows stronger signals overall
As of September 2026, bootstrap shows healthier maintenance signals than bulma. bootstrap rates Healthy overall while bulma rates Mixed. bulma last saw a commit 6 months ago with 16+ active contributors, while bootstrap was committed to 2 weeks ago with 10+ active contributors. Both use the MIT license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
jgthms/bulma
Slowing — last commit 6mo ago
No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 6mo ago; Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10…
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 6mo ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 79% of recent commits
- ⚠Scorecard: marked unmaintained (0/10)
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 6mo ago
- ✓16 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days; bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
twbs/bootstrap
Healthy across all four use cases
No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No blocking repository-level signals were found; deployment review is still required.
- ⚠Scorecard: known vulnerabilities detected (scored 0/10 by OpenSSF)
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 54% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit 1d ago
- ✓10 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| bulma | bootstrap | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 50,065 | 174,677 |
| Last commit | 6mo ago | 18d ago |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Open issues | 527 | 227 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 48% | 53% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? jgthms/bulma · twbs/bootstrap
Ask AI about jgthms/bulma vs twbs/bootstrap
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.