johnthagen/min-sized-rust vs sharkdp/fd
Both showing Healthy signals — pick on fit, not health
As of June 2026, min-sized-rust and fd both show healthy maintenance signals. min-sized-rust last saw a commit 8 months ago with 11+ active contributors, while fd last saw a commit 1 month ago with 17+ active contributors. min-sized-rust is MIT-licensed while fd is Apache-2.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
johnthagen/min-sized-rust →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 7mo ago
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 89% of recent commits
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓Last commit 7mo ago
- ✓11 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
sharkdp/fd →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 53% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit 5d ago
- ✓17 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| min-sized-rust | fd | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 9,749 | 42,886 |
| Last commit | 8mo ago | 1mo ago |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Open issues | 12 | 182 |
| Has tests | — | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 0% | 19% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? johnthagen/min-sized-rust · sharkdp/fd
Ask AI about johnthagen/min-sized-rust vs sharkdp/fd
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.