jordanbaird/ice vs p0deje/maccy
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of September 2026, ice and maccy both show mixed maintenance signals. ice last saw a commit 12 months ago with 4+ active contributors, while maccy was committed to 1 week ago with 26+ active contributors. ice is GPL-3.0-licensed while maccy is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
jordanbaird/ice
Slowing — last commit 12mo ago
copyleft license (GPL-3.0) — review compatibility; top contributor handles 95% of recent commits…
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 12mo ago; Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10…
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 12mo ago
- ⚠Small team — 4 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 95% of recent commits
- ⚠GPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ⚠No tests detected in the complete Git tree
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 12mo ago
- ✓4 active contributors
- ✓GPL-3.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
What would improve this?
- •Use as dependency Concerns to Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
p0deje/maccy
Mixed signals — read the receipts
no tests detected in the complete Git tree; no CI workflows detected…
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; no CI workflows detected…
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No tests detected in the complete Git tree
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 2d ago
- ✓26+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 35% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
What would improve this?
- •Use as dependency Mixed to Healthy if: add a test suite
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| ice | maccy | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 29,517 | 21,493 |
| Last commit | 12mo ago | 12d ago |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Open issues | 421 | 167 |
| Has tests | No | No |
| Has CI | ✓ | No |
| Test coverage | — | — |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | C | C |
| Cycles | 0 | 0 |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? jordanbaird/ice · p0deje/maccy
Ask AI about jordanbaird/ice vs p0deje/maccy
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.