jordanbaird/ice vs toptal/gitignore.io
toptal/gitignore.io shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, gitignore.io shows healthier maintenance signals than ice. gitignore.io rates Healthy overall while ice rates Mixed. ice last saw a commit 9 months ago with 4+ active contributors, while gitignore.io last saw a commit 1 year ago with 31+ active contributors. ice is GPL-3.0-licensed while gitignore.io is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
jordanbaird/ice →
Slowing — last commit 8mo ago
copyleft license (GPL-3.0) — review compatibility; top contributor handles 95% of recent commits…
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 8mo ago
- ⚠Small team — 4 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 95% of recent commits
- ⚠GPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓Last commit 8mo ago
- ✓4 active contributors
- ✓GPL-3.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
toptal/gitignore.io →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Stale — last commit 1y ago
- ✓31+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 28% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| ice | gitignore.io | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 27,835 | 8,701 |
| Last commit | 9mo ago | 1y ago |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Open issues | 389 | 66 |
| Has tests | — | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | — | 100% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? jordanbaird/ice · toptal/gitignore.io
Ask AI about jordanbaird/ice vs toptal/gitignore.io
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.