josephmisiti/awesome-machine-learning vs sjmoran/low-light-video-enhancement
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of June 2026, awesome-machine-learning and low-light-video-enhancement both show mixed maintenance signals. awesome-machine-learning last saw a commit 1 month ago with 45+ active contributors, while low-light-video-enhancement last saw a commit 4 years ago with 2+ active contributors. Both use the Other license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
josephmisiti/awesome-machine-learning →
Mixed signals — read the receipts
non-standard license (Other); no tests detected…
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 51% of recent commits
- ⚠Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓Last commit 2w ago
- ✓45+ active contributors
- ✓Other licensed
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
Maintenance signals: commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
sjmoran/low-light-video-enhancement →
Stale — last commit 5y ago
non-standard license (Other); last commit was 5y ago…
no tests detected; no CI workflows detected…
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 5y ago; Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10…
- ⚠Stale — last commit 5y ago
- ⚠Small team — 2 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 97% of recent commits
- ⚠Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ⚠Scorecard: marked unmaintained (0/10)
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓2 active contributors
- ✓Other licensed
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms; 1 commit in the last 365 days
- →Fork & modify Mixed → Healthy if: add a test suite
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days; bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Maintenance signals: commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests + OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| awesome-machine-learning | low-light-video-enhancement | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 72,424 | 34 |
| Last commit | 1mo ago | 4y ago |
| License | Other | Other |
| Open issues | 13 | 0 |
| Has tests | — | — |
| Has CI | — | — |
| Test coverage | 0% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | 0 critical · 0 high · 1 moderate · 0 low |
| Architecture grade | — | A |
| Cycles | — | 0 |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? josephmisiti/awesome-machine-learning · sjmoran/low-light-video-enhancement
Ask AI about josephmisiti/awesome-machine-learning vs sjmoran/low-light-video-enhancement
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.