josephmisiti/awesome-machine-learning vs zai-org/open-autoglm
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of June 2026, awesome-machine-learning and open-autoglm both show mixed maintenance signals. awesome-machine-learning last saw a commit 1 month ago with 45+ active contributors, while open-autoglm last saw a commit 3 months ago with 13+ active contributors. awesome-machine-learning is Other-licensed while open-autoglm is Apache-2.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
josephmisiti/awesome-machine-learning →
Mixed signals — read the receipts
non-standard license (Other); no tests detected…
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 51% of recent commits
- ⚠Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓Last commit 2w ago
- ✓45+ active contributors
- ✓Other licensed
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
Maintenance signals: commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
zai-org/open-autoglm →
Mixed signals — read the receipts
no tests detected; no CI workflows detected
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; no CI workflows detected
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 2mo ago
- ✓13 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 39% of recent commits)
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: add a test suite
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Maintenance signals: commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests + OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| awesome-machine-learning | open-autoglm | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 72,424 | 25,289 |
| Last commit | 1mo ago | 3mo ago |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Open issues | 13 | 254 |
| Has tests | — | — |
| Has CI | — | — |
| Test coverage | 0% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? josephmisiti/awesome-machine-learning · zai-org/open-autoglm
Ask AI about josephmisiti/awesome-machine-learning vs zai-org/open-autoglm
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.