jquense/yup vs reactivex/rxjs
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of July 2026, yup and rxjs both show mixed maintenance signals. yup was committed to 5 days ago with 27+ active contributors, while rxjs last saw a commit 1 year ago with 18+ active contributors. yup is MIT-licensed while rxjs is Apache-2.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
jquense/yup
OpenSSF Scorecard says this is unmaintained
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; Scorecard "Token-Permissions" is 0/10
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 50% of recent commits
- ⚠Scorecard: marked unmaintained (0/10)
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 4d ago
- ✓27+ active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
reactivex/rxjs
Stale — last commit 1y ago
last commit was 1y ago; no CI workflows detected
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 1y ago; Scorecard "Token-Permissions" is 0/10…
- ⚠Stale — last commit 1y ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 59% of recent commits
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ✓18 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Use as dependency Mixed to Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 365 days
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days; bring "Token-Permissions" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| yup | rxjs | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 23,669 | 31,690 |
| Last commit | 5d ago | 1y ago |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Open issues | 247 | 300 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | — |
| Test coverage | 64% | 3% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? jquense/yup · reactivex/rxjs
Ask AI about jquense/yup vs reactivex/rxjs
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.