juliusbrussee/caveman vs mvdan/sh
juliusbrussee/caveman shows stronger signals overall
As of September 2026, caveman shows healthier maintenance signals than sh. caveman rates Healthy overall while sh rates Mixed. caveman was committed to 1 week ago with 8+ active contributors, while sh last saw a commit 4 months ago with 7+ active contributors. caveman is MIT-licensed while sh is BSD-3-Clause-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
juliusbrussee/caveman
Healthy across all four use cases
No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No blocking repository-level signals were found; deployment review is still required.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 74% of recent commits
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓8 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
mvdan/sh
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 84% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit 4d ago
- ✓7 active contributors
- ✓BSD-3-Clause licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| caveman | sh | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 103,084 | 8,723 |
| Last commit | 13d ago | 4mo ago |
| License | MIT | BSD-3-Clause |
| Open issues | 95 | 110 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 100% | 49% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | A | — |
| Cycles | 0 | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? juliusbrussee/caveman · mvdan/sh
Ask AI about juliusbrussee/caveman vs mvdan/sh
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.