juliusbrussee/caveman vs opencode-ai/opencode
juliusbrussee/caveman shows stronger signals overall
As of September 2026, caveman shows healthier maintenance signals than opencode. caveman rates Healthy overall while opencode rates Mixed. caveman was committed to 1 week ago with 8+ active contributors, while opencode last saw a commit 12 months ago with 28+ active contributors. Both use the MIT license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
juliusbrussee/caveman
Healthy across all four use cases
No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No blocking repository-level signals were found; deployment review is still required.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 74% of recent commits
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓8 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
opencode-ai/opencode
Slowing — last commit 11mo ago
No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 11mo ago; Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 11mo ago
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 11mo ago
- ✓28+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 49% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| caveman | opencode | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 103,084 | 13,682 |
| Last commit | 13d ago | 12mo ago |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Open issues | 95 | 158 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 100% | 3% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | 0 critical · 0 high · 1 moderate · 0 low |
| Architecture grade | A | A |
| Cycles | 0 | 0 |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? juliusbrussee/caveman · opencode-ai/opencode
Ask AI about juliusbrussee/caveman vs opencode-ai/opencode
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.