juliusbrussee/caveman vs quantumnous/new-api
Both showing Healthy signals — pick on fit, not health
As of September 2026, caveman and new-api both show healthy maintenance signals. caveman was committed to 1 week ago with 8+ active contributors, while new-api was committed to 1 week ago with 30+ active contributors. caveman is MIT-licensed while new-api is AGPL-3.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
juliusbrussee/caveman
Healthy across all four use cases
No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No blocking repository-level signals were found; deployment review is still required.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 74% of recent commits
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓8 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
quantumnous/new-api
Strong maintenance signals
copyleft license (AGPL-3.0) — review compatibility
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No blocking repository-level signals were found; deployment review is still required.
- ⚠AGPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓30+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 32% of recent commits)
- ✓AGPL-3.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Use as dependency Concerns to Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| caveman | new-api | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 103,084 | 47,205 |
| Last commit | 13d ago | 13d ago |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Open issues | 95 | 1,333 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 100% | 17% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | A | A |
| Cycles | 0 | 0 |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? juliusbrussee/caveman · quantumnous/new-api
Ask AI about juliusbrussee/caveman vs quantumnous/new-api
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.