junegunn/fzf vs pocketbase/pocketbase
Both showing Healthy signals — pick on fit, not health
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
junegunn/fzf →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓16 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
Show 3 more →Show less
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 79% of recent commits
Maintenance signals: commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests + OpenSSF Scorecard
pocketbase/pocketbase →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ✓Last commit 2d ago
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
Show 2 more →Show less
- ✓Tests present
- ⚠Solo or near-solo (1 contributor active in recent commits)
Maintenance signals: commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| fzf | pocketbase | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 80,289 | 58,210 |
| Last commit | today | 8d ago |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Open issues | 318 | 17 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 20% | 22% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? junegunn/fzf · pocketbase/pocketbase
Ask AI about junegunn/fzf vs pocketbase/pocketbase
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.