junit-team/junit4 vs scwang90/smartrefreshlayout
junit-team/junit4 shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, junit4 shows healthier maintenance signals than smartrefreshlayout. junit4 rates Healthy overall while smartrefreshlayout rates Mixed. junit4 last saw a commit 1 month ago with 16+ active contributors, while smartrefreshlayout last saw a commit 1 year ago with 8+ active contributors. junit4 is EPL-1.0-licensed while smartrefreshlayout is Apache-2.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
junit-team/junit4 →
Healthy across the board
non-standard license (EPL-1.0)
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Non-standard license (EPL-1.0) — review terms
- ✓Last commit 1w ago
- ✓16 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 49% of recent commits)
- ✓EPL-1.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
scwang90/smartrefreshlayout →
Stale — last commit 1y ago
last commit was 1y ago; no CI workflows detected
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 1y ago; no CI workflows detected
- ⚠Stale — last commit 1y ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 52% of recent commits
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ✓8 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 365 days
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| junit4 | smartrefreshlayout | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 8,531 | 25,159 |
| Last commit | 1mo ago | 1y ago |
| License | EPL-1.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Open issues | 0 | 341 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | — |
| Test coverage | 100% | 72% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? junit-team/junit4 · scwang90/smartrefreshlayout
Ask AI about junit-team/junit4 vs scwang90/smartrefreshlayout
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.