juspay/hyperswitch vs sharkdp/fd
Both showing Healthy signals — pick on fit, not health
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
juspay/hyperswitch →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓30+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 29% of recent commits)
Show 4 more →Show less
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
Maintenance signals: commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests + OpenSSF Scorecard
sharkdp/fd →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ✓Last commit 5d ago
- ✓17 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
Show 3 more →Show less
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 53% of recent commits
Maintenance signals: commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| hyperswitch | fd | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 42,600 | 42,886 |
| Last commit | 3d ago | 13d ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Open issues | 1,685 | 182 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 2% | 19% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? juspay/hyperswitch · sharkdp/fd
Ask AI about juspay/hyperswitch vs sharkdp/fd
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.