kanwei/algorithms vs mame/quine-relay
kanwei/algorithms shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, algorithms shows healthier maintenance signals than quine-relay. algorithms rates Healthy overall while quine-relay rates Mixed. algorithms last saw a commit 3 months ago with 15+ active contributors, while quine-relay last saw a commit 8 months ago with 10+ active contributors. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
kanwei/algorithms →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 77% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit 2mo ago
- ✓15 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
mame/quine-relay →
Slowing — last commit 7mo ago
no license — legally unclear
no license — can't legally use code
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
no license — can't legally use code; last commit was 7mo ago
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 7mo ago
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 84% of recent commits
- ⚠No license — legally unclear to depend on
- ✓Last commit 7mo ago
- ✓10 active contributors
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: publish a permissive license (MIT, Apache-2.0, etc.)
- →Fork & modify Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
- →Deploy as-is Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| algorithms | quine-relay | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 2,697 | 14,476 |
| Last commit | 3mo ago | 8mo ago |
| License | MIT | — |
| Open issues | 16 | 17 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 71% | 3% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? kanwei/algorithms · mame/quine-relay
Ask AI about kanwei/algorithms vs mame/quine-relay
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.