karpathy/autoresearch vs stability-ai/generative-models
stability-ai/generative-models shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, generative-models shows healthier maintenance signals than autoresearch. generative-models rates Healthy overall while autoresearch rates Mixed. autoresearch last saw a commit 3 months ago with 9+ active contributors, while generative-models last saw a commit 6 months ago with 24+ active contributors. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
karpathy/autoresearch →
Missing license — unclear to depend on
no license — legally unclear; no tests detected…
no license — can't legally use code; no tests detected…
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
no license — can't legally use code; no CI workflows detected
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 78% of recent commits
- ⚠No license — legally unclear to depend on
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓Last commit 6w ago
- ✓9 active contributors
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: publish a permissive license (MIT, Apache-2.0, etc.)
- →Fork & modify Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
- →Deploy as-is Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
stability-ai/generative-models →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 5mo ago
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 5mo ago
- ✓24+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 15% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| autoresearch | generative-models | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 79,838 | 27,151 |
| Last commit | 3mo ago | 6mo ago |
| License | — | MIT |
| Open issues | 186 | 340 |
| Has tests | — | ✓ |
| Has CI | — | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 0% | 13% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? karpathy/autoresearch · stability-ai/generative-models
Ask AI about karpathy/autoresearch vs stability-ai/generative-models
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.