keras-team/keras vs sapientinc/hrm
keras-team/keras shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, keras shows healthier maintenance signals than hrm. keras rates Healthy overall while hrm rates Mixed. keras was committed to today with 25+ active contributors, while hrm last saw a commit 2 months ago with 5+ active contributors. Both use the Apache-2.0 license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
keras-team/keras →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Scorecard: known vulnerabilities detected (scored 0/10 by OpenSSF)
- ✓Last commit 1d ago
- ✓25+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 14% of recent commits)
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
sapientinc/hrm →
Mixed signals — read the receipts
no tests detected; no CI workflows detected
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; no CI workflows detected
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 50% of recent commits
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 7w ago
- ✓5 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: add a test suite
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| keras | hrm | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 64,097 | 12,432 |
| Last commit | today | 2mo ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Open issues | 219 | 76 |
| Has tests | ✓ | — |
| Has CI | ✓ | — |
| Test coverage | 1% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? keras-team/keras · sapientinc/hrm
Ask AI about keras-team/keras vs sapientinc/hrm
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.